Aircraft Spruce Australia
Melbourne, VIC Australia
Aircraft Spruce Australia- Wishlists
- +61 (1800) 953522
- Contact Us
Contact Us
Call Us
Sign In
- Photo may represent series and not specific product
- SHARE
Superior SA652984 Shaft, Rocker
MFR Model# SA652984
- JUMP TO
- Overview
- Reviews
- Q&A
- View in Catalog
| Vendor Part Number | Quantity Needed | Description | Part Number |
|---|---|---|---|
| SA652984 | 12 | Rocker Shafts | 08-11488 |
Overview
| Continental engines are the culmination of hundreds of parts improvements made over the last six decades. |
Reviews
No distinguishable difference between this seal and the higher priced TCM seal. Works great would buy again.
Works as advertised! Fast shipping
Fit perfectly solved intake leak. A&P
Product received as expected fits well, good performance
very helpful staff
Great product
Superior products are...Superior
Very high quality replacement hose and I much appreciate the speed of delivery
I got this just incase I tore the other valve cover gasket. (SA534857). Turned out it was the same one I had already on the valve cover. I thought it was the cheap cork, this was a nice gasket. For $2.66 it was well worth it.
It arrived on time and was complete package to replace the cylinder on my 310
Q&A
Please note, Aircraft Spruce Australia's personnel are not certified aircraft mechanics and can only provide general support and ideas, which should not be relied upon or implemented in lieu of consulting an A&P or other qualified technician. Aircraft Spruce Australia assumes no responsibility or liability for any issue or problem which may arise from any repair, modification or other work done from this knowledge base. Any product eligibility information provided here is based on general application guides and we recommend always referring to your specific aircraft parts manual, the parts manufacturer or consulting with a qualified mechanic.
Yes, the difference is the manufacturer. Yes, the manufacturer of SA30979-9 has FAA-PMA approval as a replacement for 630979-9.
Yes that is correct.
